0. Snapshot
| Axis | Your score | Leaning |
|---|---|---|
| Economic: Equality ↔ Markets | +64 | strongly toward Equality |
| State: Authority ↔ Liberty | −27 | moderately toward Liberty |
| Culture: Progress ↔ Tradition | +77 | strongly toward Progress |
| World: Global ↔ Nation | +53 | toward Global |
| Ecology: Ecology ↔ Growth | +83 | very strongly toward Ecology |
| Faith: Secular ↔ Religious | +54 | toward Secular |
| Change: Revolution ↔ Reform | +18 | slightly toward Revolution (near the middle) |
| Scale: Local ↔ Central | +32 | moderately toward Local |
Top matches: Green Politics / Eco-Socialism (92.4%) · Democratic Socialism (89.9%) · Progressivism (89.1%)
You hold a coherent, values-driven outlook. Your strongest commitments are to environmental protection, social and cultural openness, and a fairer distribution of wealth. Alongside these you show a clear respect for individual liberty and local decision-making, and a near-even view on how change should happen. The three nearest traditions are close together (within about 3 points), so you sit in a cluster rather than in one camp. This report explains what each axis means, how your answers place you on it, where you differ from your matches, and which thinkers and books best fit your views.
1. Axis by axis
Economic: Equality ↔ Markets (+64)
Equality means sharing wealth and resources more evenly, with strong public services, unions and redistribution. Markets means free markets and private property as the best way to allocate resources, with low taxes and light regulation.
You lean strongly toward Equality. You strongly agreed that "The rich should pay a higher share of their income in taxes." [P002], "Workers should have a say in how their companies are run." [P005] and "Companies should share profits with their employees." [P016], and you strongly disagreed that "Wealth created by entrepreneurs benefits everyone eventually." [P021]. Your scenario answers fit: you would nationalise a collapsing bank "A major bank is about to collapse. The government should..." [P170], strengthen unions to fix stagnant wages "Wages have stagnated for a decade. The best fix is..." [P174], and tax robots to fund a basic income if automation hit "A new technology will automate millions of jobs. Government should..." [P177].
Notice where your emphasis falls: on workplace power (a say for workers, profit-sharing, unions) as much as on taxes. That is closer to the democratic socialist tradition than to welfare-state liberalism, which focuses mainly on redistribution.
State: Authority ↔ Liberty (−27)
Authority holds that a strong state and order keep society safe and functioning. Liberty holds that individuals should be free from state control, with civil liberties first.
You lean moderately toward Liberty. You strongly agreed that "People should be free to say offensive things." [P024], strongly disagreed that "The police should have more powers to stop and search." [P030], and think climate protesters "Protesters block a major road for climate action. You think..." [P178]. You also strongly agreed that "Citizens should be allowed to own weapons for self-defence." [P029]. That answer is less common in your cluster and is discussed in section 4.
Culture: Progress ↔ Tradition (+77)
Progress means society should change its norms and embrace new ways of living. Tradition means inherited customs, family and institutions carry wisdom worth preserving.
This is one of your strongest axes. You strongly agreed that "Society should be more accepting of non-traditional family structures." [P043], "Same-sex marriage should be legal." [P047], "Art that challenges social norms is valuable." [P048] and "Equal rights for minorities should be a top priority." [P057]. You strongly disagreed that "Traditions should be respected even if their original reasons are forgotten." [P045] and that "Modern culture has lost important values." [P062]. Faced with a statue of a controversial historical figure, you would remove it entirely "A historic statue of a controversial figure stands in a city square. You would..." [P175].
World: Global ↔ Nation (+53)
Global favours cooperation across borders, international institutions and open movement. Nation puts national sovereignty, borders and national interest first.
You lean toward Global. You strongly agreed that "Immigration enriches a country's culture." [P065] and "Refugees fleeing war should be welcomed." [P074], and strongly disagreed that "Patriotism is an important value to teach children." [P084]. In a pandemic you would coordinate globally through international bodies "A pandemic hits. The best response is..." [P169], and you would prefer UN peacekeeping to a military alliance "Your country is asked to join a military alliance. You would..." [P176]. Interestingly, on rising immigration you chose to let regions set their own quotas "Immigration levels are rising quickly. The government should..." [P172], which is your local axis appearing inside a global question.
Ecology: Ecology ↔ Growth (+83)
Ecology means environmental protection takes priority even at economic cost. Growth means development takes priority over environmental limits.
This is your strongest axis. You strongly agreed that "We should accept slower economic growth to protect the environment." [P085], "Fossil fuels should be phased out quickly." [P086] and "Nature has value beyond its use to humans." [P089], and strongly disagreed that "Climate concerns are often exaggerated." [P087] and that "Environmental regulations hurt jobs too much." [P088]. Faced with a factory that brings 2,000 jobs but pollutes a river, you would reject it "A new factory will bring 2,000 jobs but pollute a river. You would..." [P168]. That is a clear willingness to accept real economic trade-offs for ecological reasons.
Faith: Secular ↔ Religious (+54)
Secular keeps religion separate from law and public policy. Religious lets religious values inform law and public life.
You lean secular, though less strongly than on other axes. You strongly disagreed that "Laws should reflect the moral teachings of the majority faith." [P123], agreed that "Science is a better guide than religion for public decisions." [P110], and think public land should not be used for religious buildings "A religious group wants to build a large place of worship in your town. You think..." [P173].
Change: Revolution ↔ Reform (+18)
Revolution holds that deep problems require fundamental, rapid transformation. Reform holds that change should be gradual and work through existing institutions.
You sit near the middle, with a slight lean toward systemic change. You strongly agreed that "Most major problems come from the system itself, not individuals." [P132] and strongly disagreed that "Small reforms add up to big progress over time." [P147], yet your overall score stays moderate because many of your other change answers were measured. Your diagnosis is systemic, but your preferred methods are not necessarily radical.
Scale: Local ↔ Central (+32)
Local places power with communities, regions and voluntary associations. Central places decisions with a strong central government.
You lean moderately local. You strongly agreed that "Neighbourhood assemblies should have real decision-making power." [P156] and "Cities should be able to set their own laws on many issues." [P160], and strongly disagreed that "A single national curriculum is best for fairness." [P167]. On a leader extending term limits, you chose "A popular leader wants to extend their term limit. You think..." [P179].
2. Your top-3 matches
1. Green Politics / Eco-Socialism — 92.4%
Core beliefs: ecological sustainability first; social justice and grassroots democracy; non-violence. Green politics emerged from the environmental, anti-nuclear and peace movements of the 1970s, and its "four pillars" (ecology, social justice, grassroots democracy, non-violence) became a common platform. Eco-socialists add a critique of capitalism's growth imperative. Why it fits: your strongest axis (ecology, +83), your local leaning (+32) and your progressive culture score (+77) all match this tradition's profile closely. Where you differ: you are somewhat more economically egalitarian than the typical green position, and slightly more liberty-minded.
2. Democratic Socialism — 89.9%
Core beliefs: social ownership of key industries through democratic means; strong welfare and labour rights; political democracy together with economic democracy. It grew from 19th-century labour parties that chose elections over revolution. Why it fits: your emphasis on workers' voice "Workers should have a say in how their companies are run." [P005], profit-sharing "Companies should share profits with their employees." [P016] and union strength "Wages have stagnated for a decade. The best fix is..." [P174], and your readiness to nationalise a failing bank "A major bank is about to collapse. The government should..." [P170]. Where you differ: you are much more ecological and more local than the classic democratic socialist profile, which historically leaned on national planning.
3. Progressivism — 89.1%
Core beliefs: use public policy to solve social problems; expand rights and inclusion; reform institutions using evidence. Why it fits: your very strong culture score and your priority on minority rights "Equal rights for minorities should be a top priority." [P057]. Where you differ: you are more economically radical, and more sceptical of gradual reform "Small reforms add up to big progress over time." [P147], than the reformist core of progressivism.
3. Your nearest thinkers
- E.F. Schumacher (green), author of Small Is Beautiful, argued for human-scale economics. This connects your local leaning "Neighbourhood assemblies should have real decision-making power." [P156] with your ecological priority "We should accept slower economic growth to protect the environment." [P085].
- Murray Bookchin (green / social ecology) linked ecological crisis to social hierarchy and favoured municipal democracy. This echoes your systemic view "Most major problems come from the system itself, not individuals." [P132] and your support for neighbourhood assemblies "Neighbourhood assemblies should have real decision-making power." [P156].
- R.H. Tawney (democratic socialism) wrote Equality, arguing that a fair society requires economic as well as political equality, which aligns with "The rich should pay a higher share of their income in taxes." [P002] and "Companies should share profits with their employees." [P016].
- John Dewey (progressivism) saw democracy as a way of life and stressed experimentation and education. This fits your view that "Art that challenges social norms is valuable." [P048].
4. Your internal tensions
These are not errors. Every thoughtful worldview contains tensions, and noticing them is how views mature.
- Liberty and weapons vs. your cluster's typical position. You strongly agreed that citizens should be allowed to own weapons for self-defence "Citizens should be allowed to own weapons for self-defence." [P029]. Most green and democratic socialist traditions favour stricter regulation. Your answer is consistent with your broader liberty leaning "People should be free to say offensive things." [P024]; "The police should have more powers to stop and search." [P030]: you may see self-defence as a civil liberty that should not depend on the state. It is worth asking yourself whether you apply the same liberty principle to economic choices, where you favour more collective control.
- Global values, local control. You favour open borders in principle "Immigration enriches a country's culture." [P065]; "Refugees fleeing war should be welcomed." [P074] but chose regional immigration quotas "Immigration levels are rising quickly. The government should..." [P172]. This reflects a known tension within green politics itself: local, decentralised ideals can conflict with the need for global coordination.
- Systemic diagnosis, moderate methods. You see problems as systemic "Most major problems come from the system itself, not individuals." [P132] and doubt small reforms "Small reforms add up to big progress over time." [P147], but your change score is only +18. This mirrors a debate in green politics between degrowth and green-growth advocates, and in democratic socialism over how far electoral compromise dilutes long-term goals.
- Ecology vs. equality. Our knowledge base notes that ambitious environmental policies can impose costs on lower-income people. You rejected the jobs-for-pollution factory "A new factory will bring 2,000 jobs but pollute a river. You would..." [P168]; a natural follow-up question is how those 2,000 workers would be supported under your approach.
5. Common misconceptions about your matches
- Green politics is not only about the environment. Social justice and democracy are core to it. It is also not uniformly anti-technology, since many greens support renewables and innovation.
- Democratic socialism is not communism. It insists on multiparty democracy and civil liberties. Nor does it mean that the state owns everything; cooperatives and public enterprises are common proposals.
- Progressivism has no single fixed programme. Its meaning shifts by era and country, and it originated in economic reform rather than in cultural issues alone.
6. How you compare with famous historical positions
- Edmund Burke (conservatism): argued that inherited institutions hold accumulated wisdom and should be changed only gradually. You stand almost opposite him on tradition "Traditions should be respected even if their original reasons are forgotten." [P045] and on gradualism "Small reforms add up to big progress over time." [P147].
- Friedrich Hayek (market liberalism): argued that markets coordinate dispersed knowledge better than planners. You diverge strongly on economics "Wealth created by entrepreneurs benefits everyone eventually." [P021], though you share his concern about concentrated power, as your local leaning shows.
- John Stuart Mill (liberalism): defended free expression even of offensive views. On this you agree closely "People should be free to say offensive things." [P024].
- Peter Kropotkin (anarcho-communism): stressed mutual aid and decentralised federations. You share his local and cooperative instincts, but not his rejection of the state.
7. Reading list (easy to hard)
- E.F. Schumacher, Small Is Beautiful: short, readable and foundational for green economics.
- Michael Harrington, Socialism: Past and Future: an accessible history of democratic socialism.
- John Dewey, The Public and Its Problems: progressive democratic theory.
- R.H. Tawney, Equality: the classic argument for economic equality.
- Murray Bookchin, The Ecology of Freedom: dense but rewarding social ecology.
- Sheri Berman, The Primacy of Politics: a scholarly history of social democracy, useful for comparison.
8. Questions to keep exploring
- If you had to choose, would you trade some economic growth for ecology even if it raised costs for low-income households? How would you offset that?
- Where exactly does your liberty principle stop, for example on speech, weapons or economic freedom?
- What is the right level of government for climate policy: neighbourhood, nation or the globe?
This report was generated by AI from your answers and our knowledge base. It describes theoretical traditions, not parties, and does not evaluate any current politician or party.